I understand this part, I left negative feedback on the OP account because I don't think it's fair what his site does to people, they are stealing and cheating people. but I didn't leave negative feedback on the signature campaign participants' account because honestly they already entered the campaign with negative feedback and then it's up to them to analyze if they think it's fair and correct to be promoting a scam site, I prefer to let it be themselves to put their hands on their conscience and analyze whether it is fair and correct to promote a scam site.
I can understand what you are trying to convey, but not red tagging participants and letting them escape doesn't make any sense. They are adults and they should be responsible for their own decisions at the end of the day.
Scam sites like 1xbit won't get banned from this forum due to the freedom of opinion clause which is why red tagging participants is the next best alternative in my opinion.
I think the same. Tagging is a method to combat scams and frauds on the forum. The members who are negatively tagged are deliberately promoting a scam casino. It is an active aid to fraud, something that is actually punishable by law in the real world.