So, why are you here? Why don't you live your life with this debt-based money you love using of, and leave those "clumsy" Bitcoiners to live their own lives with their "fraudulent money" as you're saying?
You appear once in a while, and want to convince us all that you're right. You repeat the same bullshit, "Bitcoin doesn't exist", "Satoshi lies you" etc., to achieve what exactly? This behavior shows me you're either ill-intentioned or simply problematic. Perhaps both.
I've repeatedly told you that Bitcoin doesn't have a tangible representation and only exists units-wise. People can imagine it exists, that it's some sort digital metal, that it's a public ledger, it's a matter of creativity beyond a certain level.
You're repeatedly told me things that have no bases in reality. I debunked literally every statement that you made. And you just keep repeat them. Now you're questioning my motivation. What's next? You want to know how old I am? Or what I like to eat?
My point is what I have wrote: if you say that 5 digital(intangible) books or movies exist, you are not supposed to show number "5". But books and movies.
In the same way, if you say that a specific number of digital (intangible) bitcois exists, you're not supposed to show number, but digital products. However, all you can show is a number. Essentially, you are proving that bitcoin doesn't exist.
Do you even read my replies?
Here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5389815.msg59606677#msg59606677I explained that there are
two numbers in bitcoin. One is the balance, sure that's just a number. But we also have private and public keys (which are numbers) that prove the ownership.
Nobody claims that showing the first number (balance) proves ownership. It's the 'second number', the cryptographic keys.
Since you claim these are easy to generate, I challenge you to just 'come up with' or 'generate' a number (key) that grants you 1BTC.
You also didn't reply to my challenge of downloading the blockchain and thus owning all the coins (which you laughingly claimed possible before). Why?
Everyone that has installed the wallet app has keys an numbers attached. Everyone that has downloaded blockchain can see numbers and addresses. Anyone that would pay $1.2 trillion today to have the sum of all the numbers in the Satoshi's system attached to their address, would have a number attached, the same as everyone that holds an address in the system. It's just that the number would be different. But nobody would own something. A guy with 18,000,000 attached to his address, and a guy with 0 attached, can both show only keys and and math symbols. Nothing else. There's no difference between them. So, what is your point?