While i can understand you disagreement, it sounds like standard ToS where they include any possible user activity that could give them trouble. Even other privacy-oriented VPN mentioned in this forum have some unsettling/vague details on their ToS, such as
~
It sounds like the standard disclaimer that anyone just dismisses and clicks "ok" on. In my opinion, a VPN is one of those services where you should
not dismiss terms you don't agree with.
All the more reason I won't use any of those VPNs.
There's literally nothing like it in Mullvad's Terms.I get your point and i would question those ToS if i'm doing high-risk activity. However, the initial discussion was about VPN with fairly good privacy for 4K streaming. Do you think ProtonVPN is bad choice for privacy even if your main usage is 4K streaming? Can you suggest another VPN with better ToS/privacy policy which also promise it's suitable for 4K streaming, have very high bandwidth or low delay?