TLDR; clickbaity article says that Peter Wuille is Satoshi.
Behind this misleading "proof, reasoning and statistical analysis" there's a coincidence that Peter registered in bitcointalk few days after Satoshi's last active date. Just another meaningless attempt where we try to unmask Satoshi.
People will always try to point out coincidence as much as they can because they're obsessed with answers that weren't really there, I don't mind these kind of people doing this stuff though, it's amusing that they're still obsessing over the enigma that we call Satoshi Nakamoto.