<...>
^ It is totally different to gamble against house edge than to gamble with the true opponent because in the house edge there is no doubt that it is based on luck than skills. Speaking of poker, it seems this game is 60/40, 40 percent of luck, and 60 percent of skills, strategies, and techniques. While if you are against the house edge, it is pure luck. Roobet has many games that you can play, but as of now, I will go in sports betting which also has the potential to win if you know the sports and the team that have match.
^ It is totally different to gamble against house edge than to gamble with the true opponent because in the house edge there is no doubt that it is based on luck than skills. Speaking of poker, it seems this game is 60/40, 40 percent of luck, and 60 percent of skills, strategies, and techniques. While if you are against the house edge, it is pure luck. Roobet has many games that you can play, but as of now, I will go in sports betting which also has the potential to win if you know the sports and the team that have match.
yes, this is the point!
the house edge plays a huge role when it comes to luck vs skill games
I think the same that knowing the game could give you an edge on sports betting
but probably a really small edge since there are so many variables, what do you think?
The edge depends on how skillful the gambler is, even a small advantage could already make a person profitable. In general, I consider sports betting as a skilled based type of game, but if a gambler does not have knowledge of the particular sports he is betting, or even just a small knowledge only, then it should not fall to the skilled based classification on his level.
depends on the game
pure luck games like slots won't have a different outcome with different people
at least statistics says so...
but yes, agree with you for sports betting
