Hi Spartacus,

I used to read http://vaccinepapers.org pretty regularly, and I'm guessing that you (or some of you) did as well.  VP kinda went dark/silent about the time they kicked off the scamdemic.  Good reference data on the site at least.

There is so much BS floating around these days, and a fair bit of it seems to be psychological operations of one flavor or another.  ICENI is similar to VP in terms of technical level and I appreciate it.  It would be kind of nice to get your input on other sources which identify and evaluate papers at a similar level, rigor, and skepticism.  And, or course, are not afraid to cross over into 'crime think' when it comes to rationally hypothesizing about the players and motives behind some of the observations.