Why not needed? Because, Superbru itself offers a tie breaker policy.
Tie breaking
In the event of points ties on a leaderboard, position is allocated on the basis of higher WP total, then the higher MP total, then lower TDM. TDM is Total Distance from Margin: the sum of the differences between a player's margin predictions and the actual margins. Example: Where Thrashing = 4, Easy = 3, Comfortable = 2, Narrow = 1: if you picked Easy (3) and the result was Narrow (1), your TDM for that match would be 3 - 1 = 2. Lower is better.
So I think we don't need the rule mentioned in the main thread and we could follow the tie breaker policy of Superbru.
I am not sure if this was already discussed in the thread, as I didn't go through it all
For final tally we actually follow superbru tie breaker rules, If my memory serves me well then i guess we faced this situation at least 1 time, where 2 participants had same points, not sure if it was for 1st or other positions.
My understanding of this rule is that, we've 3 dedicated % of pool amount for 3 different positions (1st,2nd,3rd) similar to lotto winners.
If more than 1 person sharing a same position with exact numbers, which is highly unlikely due to superbru system (Win, margin, TDM) so they should share the prize money which is allotted to that particular position. It's seems fair practice in regard to other winners also but please let me know what you guys think?