After reading the long draft, I was thinking that I didn't remember reading in the draft what franky1 had posted. I took him off ignore, looked up what he had posted, without citing the source, and I see that it is not in this draft.
After investigating, I see that he is quoting
a previous draft that was not approved.https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020PC0593The draft he cites is this one, which is not the one that was voted on last Thursday, nor the one I am referring to or referred to in the articles cited in the OP.
what you are now quoting. is not a "DRAFT"
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CJ12-PR-704888_EN.pdfthis is not the draft. its just a subset of possible amendments to make to the draft
what you are quoting is not the full document with full explanation and detail. you are just reference only the chapters they want to change.
and no i doubt you even dared read the entire draft and then compared all referenced amendments to see how it changes the wording. i predict you just copy and pasted my exert of the draft to google search for it and then see its not the same link as your are looking at (your subset) and thought oh look franky is not reading what im reading
but it is now funny how you and your chums are NOW using the words "service providers" and trying to hide your previous opinion of "non-custodial wallets"
very revealing