Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Goodbye, privacy, goodbye, it was nice while it lasted.
by
Poker Player
on 03/04/2022, 03:09:37 UTC
After investigating, I see that he is quoting a previous draft that was not approved.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020PC0593

The draft he cites is this one, which is not the one that was voted on last Thursday, nor the one I am referring to or referred to in the articles cited in the OP.


There are two different drafts, mentioning the same thing, one superseding the other
This is the one from 2019 the MICA regulation, the same paragraph that o_e_l_e_o posted
52020PC0595,

wonder where did he got this text from, it's not even in the draft report, because there is one big difference when it comes to a report, he mentioned:

It doesn't matter much but the text from which he extracted this information is that one, Annex IV – Minimum capital requirements for crypto-asset service providers. Just use ctrl+F and "EUR 50,000" for example.

The fact is that this text, article or whatever we want to call it, was not approved.

Regarding franky1, I have put him back on ignore, and I will not take him out. Nothing personal against you franky1, but I don't feel like arguing with you forever.