Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: PRIMEDICE weak self-exclusion system
by
Slow death
on 06/04/2022, 20:00:35 UTC
Well, first I have to congratulate you because you admit your mistakes. the measures they could take in this situation I think they already do a lot, it would not be feasible or easy for them to be controlling all addicted customers, I agree that addicted customers need to block emails from casinos and also need to be strong and resist , do not give in and play and then come to complain here on the forum.

Hello, I have been betting for a long time, and a few months ago I realized that I have problems to stop doing it.

I decided that the best way to stop was to request self-exclusion from the sites I was betting on.

I got to self-exclude myself from primedice, the problem is that after a while, I relapsed and wanted to bet again, and primedice let me create a new account, and bet again. this time, i lost 21600 xrp and a bit of some other coins




This post is not to recover my coins, (although I would like that), but to see the possibility that the sites begin to block not only the accounts, but also the IPs from which those accounts were connected.
Unfortunately this is not really a good idea, many people are sharing an IP so if they were to ban you they will need to ban all the people that may use the same IP, also your IP changes so not only they will need to ban an IP but a range of them and this is even more unfeasible.

Personally I do not see anything wrong with primedice self-exclusion measures, if you tried to log into your original account and you were still self-excluded then everything is working as intended, also I can assure you that if you tried this in a fiat casino you would have run into the same problem, and even if you did not you could have used another casino to gamble, so look for help and stay away from gambling as much as you can as you obviously have some issues with it.

I was also going to comment that casinos cannot ban IP just because someone is addicted and that can be done. there is a complexity in this IP issue