It's not about your opinion, it's about what you know and what you can prove. Opinions are the least accurate form of data.
I choose to believe facts and verifiable evidence rather than trust the opinion of a paid shill who has a history of scamming fellow members.
So it's very good that you base your opinion on evidence and facts. But I'm afraid you are wrong if you base your opinion on the screenshots that FatFork pasted here, as they only probably show the software provider's payment gateway address.
Probably? That doesn't sound very scientific or evidence-based.
As I see it, FatFork provided a good piece of evidence, so unless you have some other evidence to challenge it, FatFork has a valid hypothesis.