The problem is that you intentionally or not, but confuse bias and a set of facts. Bias is when in any situation I would call Russia guilty. Yes, I agree - there is a lot about Russia in my posts. But these are facts related to the terrorist war unleashed by them against my country. I live here, I see it with my own eyes. I know what the USSR is because I was born here. I have seen since childhood this wild propaganda and anti-human regime. And I heard about terror from my father, who served with the Soviet army, and from him I heard what she did in Afghanistan ... And after the collapse of the USSR, I spent many years studying this issue.

By the way, if you listen to the state propaganda of the USSR or Russia, then there is just a bias there - in everything, since the times of the USSR, the Americans are to blame for them. Now, since 2014, more have been added - Ukrainians

About terrorism - what a bias. Once again, this is a FACT. If you want to say that all countries have created terrorist movements, and I can only choose Russia - ok, then arguments and facts, otherwise this is a classic attempt to divert the dialogue...
But in addition to "general", while unprovable phrases, you have not a single argument! So, of course, it’s extremely easy to conduct dialogues - no need to strain, have knowledge, just deny what you don’t like, and talk about reality about what’s on hand

about your boundaries. You can philosophize a lot to me about the whole world. It was enough for me the day before yesterday to visit Irpin and Bucha. I would like you to look at what a real terrorist war is. On the corpses of tortured people, on children's corpses in the morgue, on virtually completely destroyed cities. It's good to philosophize and fantasize away from death and reality... Very easy...

About nuclear weapons - you asked, I answered whether you like it or not, but my position is exactly that, and I don't need your assessment

Why do you dislike the fact that the USSR/Russia is the birthplace of world terrorism? This is a fact, I even named the person who systematically "implemented" it, I told you when and why it originated. Show dependencies. Further - if you want to know the reality - study the topic! But you're just in denial, and you're talking some nonsense about "everyone else wants more bombs."

Total: let's switch to the format of a normal, adequate dialogue, in the format of "reasoned question <> reasoned answer"? Or don't waste my time? OK ?