Jokes apart, I am the kind of person that, provided an explanation, even if complex, can certainly understand it (even if it is rocket science - literally).
I think I explained in sufficient detail (maybe even too much) why this rocket could not fly from Shakhtyorsk, the question is whether you are capable of listening to reasonable arguments at all? In the previous message, I gave you another thread, by pulling which you can find out the truth - the amount of unburned fuel in the fuel compartment of the tail section. It's up to you what to do with it.It's OK if you consider me a victim of Russian propaganda or a stupid bum from the couch troops of a slow selective response. I see no point in trying to dissuade you from this.
You are not a victim of propaganda, you are the propaganda.
You have given details but no proof. E.g. How much of the fuel was left. In your expert opinion, how did the very knowledgeable Russian Ministry of whateverthef*ck measured the remaining fuel of that (exploded) rocket on Ukrainian soil? Where is the proof of the "angle" you mention, how did they reach their conclusions?
You see, we poor ignorant people do not have St Nicholas cell number and are too poor to consult and Astrologist to find out, so we tend to rely on documentary evidence and, if not available, in some logic to the situation.
e.g. Why would Ukraine attack a train station that is critical to reinforce their troops.