Ser, no need for an exaggerated reaction with this situation. Relax, it's merely an opinion. If you don't share it, then let's agree to disagree. I'm simply starting to believe that Bitcoin shouldn't be "black" or "white".
We can agree to disagree, sure, but that doesn't stop me from arguing my point. I also don't see it as an exaggeration at all. In no other walk of life would we tolerate the crazy amounts of privacy invasion and censorship being forced on us by centralized exchanges, services, and some wallets. But for some reason when it comes to bitcoin, trying to protect even a shred of your privacy becomes taboo and the default option seems to be to open your entire life up to scrutiny by a bunch of complete strangers, which is the exact opposite of the ethos behind bitcoin.
I don't debate your viewpoint, in fact, I agree with it. But please get the context, I am merely talking about something else entirely. That I simply don't want to be personally responsible if someone else's savings in Bitcoin can't be converted back to fiat because his coins were tainted. I will teach what I know, but it's up to him/her to do the act.