Almost nobody has what I (or any other reasonable analyst) consider 'proof' of anything.  We see what someone puts out over the wire.  Clearly if something which aligns with what you currently wish to or think you should believe, that is what you consider 'proof'.  It doesn't work that way for everyone.

I've seen two widely circulated in Western press interviews which kind of align with what you wish to believe.  One was from a woman who worked for USAID (CIA) but neglected to mention that little factoid.  Another was a woman who has been groomed since her early years to be a Western-associated globalist stooge with awards and what-not.

On the other hand, I see a seemingly endless stream of freshly 'liberated' people with identical stories told to alternative media people (who are the only ones actually on-the-ground in the danger zones).  The story is always the same about the radical 'nazi' type folks keeping them as human shields at gunpoint.  If either the alternative media people or the interviewees (and the selection process of choosing them) where somehow staged, they are pretty damn good actors and the scene selection rivaled the attention to detail of Stanley Kubrick.  Quite the opposite of the laughably clownish skills of the nit-wits on the Western fake-stream media who are getting busted as fast as they are pumping out their fake news.


usaid-caught-ukraine-fake-news[/b]/]https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/covid-psyop-exposed-ukraines-defensive-bioweapons-usaid-caught-ukraine-fake-news/

second-mariupol-witness-tied-us-gov[/b]-all-evidence-shows-ukraine-fired-missile-on-kramatorsk/]https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/second-mariupol-witness-tied-us-gov-all-evidence-shows-ukraine-fired-missile-on-kramatorsk/