But if the project is obviously a scam or there are pieces of evidence that the project is a scam the manager must act to stop the campaign, a good manager will not hesitate to do that and is not selfish even if he is going to get paid with tradeable coin,
If you're a bounty hunter you need to set criteria on the kind of project that you're joining, don't join for the sake of joining work smart not harder, you don't have to join everything you only have to pick the right one.
Completely agree with you. Manager is also responsible, at least partial. They should do their homework about project before accepting job. Offcourse, it's not always possible to know that project may become scam, so, manager don't have full responsibilty for these things.
You're both right. However, it is better to assume that even the manager can make a mistake. Anyone who does their own research on projects knows very well that some projects are so well prepared that it is impossible to predict the bad intentions of the creators. Bounty manager is also not able to predict whether the project has a chance of success at all, that is, collecting minimal funds for development. In both of these cases, most bounty participants call the project a scam, which is a mistake if the project collapses. This means that a very large number of people participating in the campaigns do not even understand the basics of how it works. It is better to educate users than advise them to rely on the bounty manager's opinion.