Proof 1:this is my eth address : 0xAeef2Fa5e30C8C7a47626f0471e6E3d0993da359
ETH Wallet Address: 0x99de054A706b49F6ed8BD8b31e2ec17bb8866E49
nankers --> riswantocuyTransaction Details:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0xfad0c6f44f604ee58ab2cbb43adc4822188b7069ba95b39ecbe52ce39c41630cValue: 0.01 ETH
Proof 2:Posted by :
riswantocuyAdd friends --- 1. @geaccount
I came back to confirm that there was transaction activity on the etherscan network connected to
Proof 1. also, resemblance based on username telegram
proof 2.
same here, I have a lot of time to track the address which his bounty proof, I can't find anything except merit abuse. I have only 1 proof of their Imgur account which he also used an unreasonable alibi, where he fenced off that account from his friend. but, with the ability how the alt connected to each other, I can't believe that.
I support that they are a bunch of Alt and abuse merit. I need to change the neutral tag to negative tag.
Nice catch, the fact that the connected accounts are involved in bounty cheating should be more than enough, (at least for me) to leave the alt accounts with some negative tags so that bounty managers looking to enroll them know the kind of person behind the accounts.
he will continue spamming on my local board if the manager accepted him.
I don't have a problem if only 1 but if continue spamming with 3 or 5 alt, I think it's disgusting.
I saw it after reviewing it at the local council. Because I'm from the same country as you, so it's very easy for me to understand the conversation in local language regarding this case. as Bitcoin_Arena said. leaving negative tags can help anticipate future Alt cheating in the bounty campaign.