Yep, but gender is exactly about how someone feels. You have a natural gender (or two) and then you have a psychological gender which is actually determined by internal psychological factors. There is no limit to how people may feel and how fluid that may be.
I think that is more or less the same as CNut237's view.
There is a limit: contradiction.
According to the leftist vision of gender inequality, women are discriminated against, and to alleviate this discrimination, quotas must be reserved for them in certain jobs.
Note that it is called "gender" inequality, not sex inequality.
If gender is something subjective that depends only on my feelings, simply by declaring myself a woman I have the right to access that reserved quota. Let's see who can prove that I don't feel like a woman.
If we go to objective facts, to sex, that does not happen.
To defend that there is gender discrimination and that gender is simply what one feels is contradictory.
This is perfectly true, people are people, and there will be idiots in any group of sufficient size. But we need to be aware that the other side of this is true as well, there are people who dislike concepts such as gender fluidity or homosexuality, and will cite individual examples of LGBT people being assholes in an attempt to argue that this non-representative minority is actually the norm, and they are all like that. See also the farcical "Black crimes" P&S thread.
I hope it is clear that it is not that I like or dislike the concept, it is that it is nonsense.
I hope you are not alluding to me indirectly, because my brain is capable of more than thinking that:
1) Person A has big ears.
2) Person A is an idiot:
3) Conclusion: all people with big ears are idiots.
It's just that in the last thread you already came out with such an absurd argument.