This will still have little effect because indeed when we see some people who are skeptical of bitcoin they always make excuses like this to say that bitcoin is not friendly to the environment and news like that has been done a lot to weaken the price of bitcoin, especially when fud appears.
although it's not too big because things like this have become something that is easily broken in an argument.
Of course I agree to make a rebuttal to those who are skeptical about bitcoin. Compared to bitcoin, I agree more that mining gold and other natural minerals has seriously damaged the environment that when the perception of the environmental damage caused by bitcoin is expressed, they forget about other big things.
Renewable energy has been discussed quite often, so I think it suffices to say that bitcoin is an eco-friendly asset.
But the skeptics still use this excuse to attack but I don't really have a problem with it because indeed as you said there is a lot of mining that is more destructive than bitcoin and indeed a lot of the greenhouse effect is making this hotter.
Regardless of what bitcoin is, environmental damage is an old issue that is now not good enough to continue to be discussed because it will only convey that they don't like bitcoin
