Why would any of the participants of the signature campaign write something negative about 1xbit, if the casino has been paying us fairly and regularly for a year? After all, even if someone didn't play at casino, it is natural that it is a sign of honesty.
1xbit is consistent on paying you as a participant of their signature campaign, in return you're defending 1xbit regardless of the evidence towards them as a scam site. But dont you feel any guilt that you're advertising a shady casino? Yes its because of money but dont you have concern to gamblers who might end up becoming a victim of this casino?
and also attracting potential victims because of His advertising , it is not only that he is depending the scam site instead he is also Luring another scam victim from this forum ,
so that is the manner we should look at and why this is not trustworthy site.