Surprised no one else jumped on this, but:
Bitcoinduit is just as illegal as playing Monopoly.
You just admitted that Bitcoin is play money.
There you go, misinterpreting his post, moving the goalposts and contradicting your own previous statements.
How's that? Tell me how I've misinterpreted the post. Explain how Atlas saying bitconduit is just as legal as monopoly (a board game where nothing of actual value is at stake, and you use a fake currency) can be construed any other way except that bitcoins do not count as real money. Or do you consider monopoly money to be a real form of currency?
Also, what goal posts did I move? How did I contradict myself? Did you even quote the right person?