I apologize for not being able to answer every question and comment, so I will try to finally describe our position on this case in one post.
That's OK. Liars are usually like that. They tell a lie, then they tell another lie and so on. And that's how you should be branded, as liars. You lied about making the data public and you didn't. After that you lied that you would send the data to an admin, have you done that? Of course not. LoyceV has already shown his interest in looking at the data of the player and he has plenty of experience with that. But you are not going to send it, are you?
As we have repeatedly stated, we suspect the player of using vulnerabilities in the game provider's software to win.
Your suspicions don't matter. You haven't been able to prove any of it.
The absence of pauses in the game.
Prove it. I have asked you many times. Post the proof and show the world how the player has cheated. When we are talking about suspicions, I suspect you are lying piece of shit based on your conduct so far. My suspicions outweigh yours because you haven't been able to prove anything you have said in those monologues of yours.
- Ignoring by the game provider Wazdan our specific questions about the gaming activity of this player, including the possibility of winning such amounts using low volatility and so on and so forth.
Really? Show it!
We trust SoftSwiss and are convinced that they will involve both experts and the licensing authorities to investigate. We are ready to fully trust SoftSwiss decision on this case and we will comply with it no matter what it is.
What if your Belarusian brother company SoftSwiss doesn't rule in your favor, what's the next step? Maybe the casino owner's aunt and uncle can act as the neutral party.