Please ban me. I'm serious.
I'll have no part of this bullshit forum anymore.
You ban the only people giving it a sense of reality, the only people questioning things that deserve to be questioned.
You protect the ignorant, the scammers, and the real trolls.
You've got it all backwards just because people are sensitive, sheltered luddites.
In short: Fuck you, motherfuckers.
Ban me.
+1
i can't believe this forum is supposed to be the center of the bitcoin community; this is an absolute joke.
how ever much i dislike MPOE-PR as a person, her insight is usually spot on, and her arguments usually come with allot of substance; shes probably one of the few people on this forum that actually deserve to be listened to. your doing this all wrong, you are clearly on a powertrip, or either that, you are incapable of such responsibility
and any person of authority who posts "im not fucking around" as a threat to everyone, should never be in a position of power in the first place. that's not a joke. this community needs grown ups, not kids
bullshit... it's got ridiculous and it needs a no fucking around attitude as absolutely no one is any position to dissuade the nonsense apart from moderators. I was posting nonsensical nothings purely to balance out the utter river of anti neo drivel and fud that kept on pouring into the neobee thread.
Until there is something of substance to discuss what the hell is the point of posting anything along the lines of what ended up in that thread.
RE "insights" being spot on... sure, spot on indeed:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516460.msg5708705#msg5708705I'm sorry but as much as darkstone has cited a clear case here, Herp also has a point - sock puppets with an agenda are obvious, and the direct link with MPOE-PR also has a strong case considering they were spouting the same shit in unison... but obviously is only speculation. He's clearly a man wound up in the extreme here.
As is TAT clearly, who should elaborate really because that comment doesn't make a lot of sense without more context