I was asked to respond here.
After reading most of the topic, including FortuneJack's response about their Terms, I won't Support the Flag that claims they "violated a casual or implied agreement".
I do think the Terms are shitty though. If certain bets are not allowed, cancel them before the match.
Not all the duplicated bets are canceled, only the ones that exceed 100,000 in euros.
You should clarify this in your Terms and Conditions.
Ok thks Loyce for taking the time to assess this.
Of course they're not putting that in their terms. They want to cancel as much winning bets as they feel like.
The 2 implied agreements that they violated were:
-They're not supposed to consider bets as "identical" bets that they present as different on their own betting page. No definition of the word "identical" in their terms.
-Contrary to what some have suggested here, they definitely do not refund losing identical bets, and that's perfectly in line with their terms: they "reserve the right" to cancel identical bets. So they CAN cancel them but not necessarily. Here the implied agreement is perhaps you are supposed to cancel the bets before the outcome? Because otherwise if the bet wins they cancel, if the bet loses they don't cancel, and that's what we call "scamming somebody for a bet", and the implied agreement when you deal with a decent human or organisation is that they're not supposed to scam you. If ALL identical bets were cancelled, that would have been another story.
Let anybody come and explain to me what "bets" 2, 3 and 4 are (please check my OP for the details of these bets). They are something destined to make you either lose in 95% of cases of get refunded in the best case. This is the very definition of a scam. God will make these cursed people pay.