-If you use foul language and come in here cursing and swearing you are ineligible. You can still express and be offensive no problem but no foul language or insults.
~
If a trusted member (only Senior or more) wants to do the job of the lottery + distribution that would help, please manifest so that I can send you 13.1 mBTC (cauz +3mBTC for your help + 0.1 for transaction fees).
I would have offered to do the escrow, but
I'm offended by the "no insults" rule. That's too subjective to base my ruling on.
Owlcatz is more subtle than
TMAN. Words on the internet don't bother me.
If you allow full freedom of expression (within the
forum rules), I can escrow this for you.
Allow me to quote myself on the subject at hand.
Why I didn't Support it:I was asked to respond here.
After reading most of the topic, including FortuneJack's response about their Terms, I won't Support the Flag that claims they "violated a casual or implied agreement".
I do think the Terms are shitty though. If certain bets are not allowed, cancel them before the match.
Not all the duplicated bets are canceled, only the ones that exceed 100,000 in euros.
You should clarify this in your Terms and Conditions.
FWIW: the reason I didn't Oppose the Flag is that I don't like the "shitty" Terms. Terms should be clear, not sneaky.
for members (except newbies
Jr. Members will love it! Paying low-ranking accounts to "vote" won't give you accurate results.
I would love to have you as an escrow, with your conditions (we can reverse the foul language rule). Nonetheless there is one obstacle to this: you'll have to make up your mind. Of course, you don't have to communicate to me what your decision is, just mention in a post when you make up your mind, and I'll appoint you the escrow and send you the money, and only afterwards you rule on the flag.
We're all humans and make mistakes and I think you're making a mistake. It is clearly obvious that I got freerolled by fortunejack. And even by their own rules it just doesn't add up. Either it's 100k max win per bet and I had 2 different bets, either it's 100k max win per sports outcome event and I had bets on 2 different matches. Either way, I should be getting my 200k win. Yet for some reason I only get half. Bookmakers are responsible for the rules they put out and for the bets they accept as I am responsible of any betting I make.
It would be a bad example of not making up your mind in front of such extreme accusations I am making. It's either true or not. Your stand on this is incoherent. Either I got scammed or not.
As far as the argument that I would be having a more accurate result without the Jr members, I think Sr and Hero Members should be motivated first by the sense of integrity and disdain in front of any act of scamming, and also for the reputation of the forum. The giveaway is just a little more incentive to take the time to read my scam accusation, we can always as well see the percentage of higher ranking members what they voted for.