I think that moderators care, but it surely seems that there is a certain number of "mishaps" that they seem to allow, including some abilities to correct the "mishaps" - which surely may well go beyond the judgement/discretion of others who believe it would be better to take a harder stance against some of the matters.

I appreciate pointing out the various members who other members believe to be NOT providing sufficient substantive materials/contributions, which has caused me to reflect upon my willingness to provide merits for mere links (and no commentary) especially from newbies.

I do also sometimes merit some more senior (regular) members here, even though I find it lacking in substance and lacking in commentary and taken from other folks without adequate and clear attribution... .surely we can get away with more when we are just posting memes.. and so I do not necessarily expect attributions when memes are posted.. but when there are a lot of words within the memes, then sometimes it becomes a bit more ambiguous regarding who had created that... and maybe a source/link should be provided (if it is not already stated somewhere on top of the meme).

And sometimes, even when the author of the content is listed within the picture, I become critical regarding providing a link that would help any of us to get directly to the content source because sometimes there might be a need to both verify that the source had really made that statement and/or also that the context could be helpful in terms of understanding what was said and how others were responding to such content... so in that regard, even well intended longer term members here might end up providing content that is way too ambiguous and in need of clarification (because the context might end up showing that the content did not mean what the potentially well-intending member had thought it meant).