My point above is, if PoW is so great where are all of the new coins using it.
As BlackHatCoiner pointed out, this is basically an 'argumentum ad auctoritate'.
I'd like to add (actually mentioned that earlier) that it's certainly not easy spinning up a new PoW project. You need to convince people to point their miners to your coin instead of mining a well-known, comparatively stable and easy to use (sell) cryptocurrency.
Answer , their are no new coins using it, because it is a dying tech, kind of like a dying religion that was false to begin with.
That's a totally wrong conclusion. When something is 'old', it can either be 'outdated and dying', or 'tried and tested'; it doesn't need to be the former.
PoS Tech is growing and evolving every day , what happens to a dying PoW tech is a non-issue for the rest of us.

Actually PoS was proposed 10 years ago, it was discussed on this forum and other places and dismissed as fundamentally flawed. You can work on and 'evolve' a flawed concept for as much as you want, but it won't change the fact that it's fundamentally flawed. No matter how many generations you build on it.
Which is why you have to bump your thread, as everyone already knows the conclusion of the discussion is the death of PoW.
Nope, we're just still waiting for good arguments why PoS may not be fundamentally flawed. If you're so knowledgeable about Xth generation PoS, why don't you explain how that solves the issues BlackHatCoiner brought up for discussion on page 1?
@n0nce, the developers of ethereum and doge have realized PoW is a dead end, shame you have not caught up to their thought processes yet.
Next is where you claim you are smarter than the devs that are switching.

How are you so sure that this was their reason? What makes you so sure that they don't just switch to get full control over the project, to get richer without doing anything (except holding coins they already have)? Besides the fact that as I said, ETH are trying to do this for years without success. Are you aware of that?