Out of all the previous allegations on this forum against casinos you're familiar with, how often did you believe that the player was sharing the whole story and not intentionally leaving out or making up details in attempt to make themselves look like more of a victim than they really are...in order to pressure the casino to pay them money they aren't actually entitled to.
Like I said, Stake won't just freeze your funds because you have multiple accounts. Don't be naive, there is more to this story,
If there was more to the story then why didn't Stake declare so in the communication?
Why did it become a problem only WHEN OP started to withdraw a substantial amount , which is coincidentally(?) equal to their profit.
Why did Stake ask for additional verification if it was for nothing?
I have raised these questions in my conclusion, so please refrain from making any additional replies which amount to nothing except for diluting the seriousness of OP's claim.
You have have already made up your decision, but it's based on a fallacy and biased reasoning.