Please, quote stuff that's relevant, don't highlight it like that.
Like this for example :
WHO ARE THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS THAT DID THE COMPUTER FORENSIC ANALYSIS?
It is a well-known French IT-security firm.
It has been filed with LE as part of our complaint.
There are no plans to publish it, however like I said, it remains available for further investigations if necessary.
This is my last answer to you, I'm not interested in arguing this any further, my points have been made.
That narrowed it down: It's a well-know French IT-security firm.
Glad to see you filed it with LE. Sadly, I haven't a clue as to who or what LE is.
So, we're not getting the name of the security firm eh? I'm pretty sure they're some big outfit that has a website for everybody on the planet to see and inquire about, but you opt not to give us their name. I'm going to take a stab in the dark and state THERE IS NO SECURITY FIRM THAT CONDUCTED AN AUDIT OTHERWISE YOU WOULD HAVE GIVEN US A NAME. This is not privileged information we're seeking. Besides, it's not like the outfit is going to offer up information to some Joe Blow. But, at least they'll be able to confirm that an audit did take place.
One more thing. You said: It is a well-known French IT-security firm.
Kinda negates:
Computer forensic analysis is in progress with independent auditors.
Plural > Singular