They're not disagreeing. They've just read half the sentence and started to make accusations of bribery, and then everyone who comes after does copy/paste of what the one before said with different words. It's just that they're here to throw some meaningless posts. I don't have to deal with this, and feel compelled to answer because they couldn't read 2 short sentences in my original post.
I simply want to spend time for people who want to communicate not spam.
Firstly, making consecutive posts is against the forum rules. Best to edit the new post into the previous reply.
I had gone throyghe thread and understood that some members may have misinterpreted the idea of the incentive to get support or opposition for the flag.
It's not still enough basis to moderate and delete such comments for me, engaging and clearing up the confusion is a better approach.
Having a topic to be self moderated in the first place would discourage lots of users from replying to it.