It looks like Timelord2067 and Lauda are accountable for 88% of the additions (100% of the increase) with a sore of Lauda: 4, Timelord2067: 3. Both made their way to DT2 in the last week.
Thank you for your comments - you and I have always been able to have level headed discussions via PM so I'm sure you'll understand I am simply presenting the facts as I see them.
If it wasn't for his use of the trust system to keep track of his personal disputes, Timelord2067's remaining reviews would be a good addition to DT.
Actually no. I don't - that's just a myth that's perpetuated by insecure people.
As to the three negatives where I am the sole person making such a post.
Two of the three (three being 6.9% of the 43 UID's as reported today) are alts. It was canvased in another thread their attacks on me. This person has subsequently left me alone (at least I presume they have - I have them on ignore and no one has alluded to their attcks continuing) - that said, perhaps it is time to review my previous trust feedback - I still think they would be untrustworthy in a trade, but I can convey that in neutrals I suppose.
As to the last of three... (about 2.? % of the 43) here is what I wrote:
| | Timelord2067 | | 2022-06-12 | | Reference | | One of three custodians of a charity based in the Philippines that represented itself as an official charity of this forum.
Once sizeable donations started pouring in, was an active participant in disbursing those funds for non charitable expenditures then repeatedly failed to account for the remaining fund's whereabouts. (Delete) |
In this post, I make mention there were two others:
You have created Flags on both of the other two - which are supported by more people than opposed, so I'm just wondering if you could shed like on why the other two are UNtrustworthy, but this ONE user in NOT untrustworthy?
Thanks.