I get NotATether's point, though. Wasabi was very effective at
keeping it on the low, so I feel it's crucial for us as a community to spread the word (e.g. through
a blacklist 
- I hope the irony in this topic title was appreciated!

).
The fact that their website not only doesn't admit that they are blacklisting, but in fact strongly implies that they aren't blacklist as I outlined above, is bordering on scam territory as far as I am concerned.
So I'm confused by the image, still. What do you guys think?
nopara73 and the Wasabi team are all under the delusion that they are the only viable privacy solution for Bitcoin and the last bastion of hope for the very existence of privacy. Without them, privacy is dead, in their minds. For example:
The alternative, discontinuing zkSNACKs would have set back Bitcoin privacy for decades. Blacklisting by the default coordinator, while undesirable, is a small price to pay for the future of Bitcoin's privacy.
That's exactly why we introduced blacklisting: so we can continue to operate and users can still have privacy using Bitcoin.
Wasabi Wallet 2.0 is decades ahead of other privacy solutions in Bitcoin.
I assume this is what the candle is supposed to be. Them valiantly spying on and blacklisting their users is out last hope against the darkness.
