Well you've sure developed the craft of putting lipstick on a pig into a fine art, I'll give you that. Better add to your inventory of stock replies...

Nº 271: All coins lost value
Nº 386: Hashrate's only a measure of carbon footprint
Nº 364: Dash was in a secular downtrend
Nº 210: we had some large elderly whales sell everything recently
Nº 142: Dash performs poorly leading into December
Nº 176: MNs aren't forced to sell, miners are
Nº 481: The instamine
Nº 482: Russia !!!
Nº 501: the count...must fall is to protect the income of the existing MNs
Nº 502: the collateralised count has increased while the enabled count has decreased due to a ISP upgrade


P.S. Given that "mineables" represent the control group for Dash's little "experiment" in donating the mined supply to nodes instead of miners (who are actually the group paying for it), how about producing a graph of total "mineables" marketcap from the last 3 years and overlaying Dash's share of that marketcap ?

That would actually be a useful metric for a change if you really want to promote your case for "store of value"