I think Liverpool giving out mane to bayern without bringing another top striker like him will actually affect the club, because mane has been a good and competitive striker at the club which was performing great and lifting the club as well. So i don't think mane absent wont affect the team.
Have you followed Liverpool in market transfer movements all this time?
Now Liverpool have acquired Darwin Nunez from Benfica for 100 million euros, the arrival of Darwin Nunez is projected to replace Mane, who is rumored to be going to Bayern Munich, so it would be wrong to say if Liverpool let Mane go without a suitable replacement, Darwin Nunez dared bought by Liverpool at a sufficient price and of course there are certain reasons that make klopp dare to pay a high price for the player.
To be honest I was quite surprised by Darwin Nunez's purchase, even though Liverpool rarely spend big money to buy players, this year spent a very
large amount of money to be able to bring in Darwin Nunez. It can even be said that among the big EPL teams, maybe Liverpool are the only ones who
rarely buy players at expensive prices. The last time Liverpool spent a large transfer fee was when they brought in Virgil Van Dijk from Southampton.
Now Liverpool to buy 22-year-old striker dares to spend a lot of money, meaning Jurgen Klopp saw something special from Nunez. Hopefully Nunez
can immediately adapt and contribute as expected. Because it is very likely that this year Liverpool will lose Sadio Mane, so the arrival of Nunez is
expected to fill the position left by Mane. Although I have a little doubt that Nunez can replace Mane's position, because Mane's and Nunez' playing styles
are very different. Is Klopp really planning to change his strategy for next season, therefore he bought Nunez who is a pure striker. We will all find out
once the EPL competition begins.