Bitcointalk is certainly not a hostile place for any legitimate serious business, years long promotional campaigns are proof for that, it's more likely that bitlucy owners are not very smart amateurs.
I can't help but feel this comment is somewhat directed at me for questioning Royse777's response in the Reputation board, and tagging him after he posted that the site was back on line. It's really unfortunate to see a reputable member implode like this, and blame the community for his failings. What's more unfortunate, however is that many clients are still waiting for their withdrawals. What are the odds they'll be getting their money back now?
I think your feeling is wrong.
It is clear that between Royse777 and dkbit98 there is empathy. But all dkbit98 is doing here is criticizing the casino owners and what they said that bitcointalk has become a hostile site. I and many others have criticized that sentence in recent comments.
Sorry for any confusion. I was replying to dkbit98, but what I meant was that I feel Royse777 calling the forum a hostile environment may have been directed at me. Since I was rather critical of Royse777's responses in the reputation board, and I tagged Royse777 for posting that the site was back on-line before any withdrawal requests had been honored. I can see how my post may have been misinterpreted.
I'm not taking it personally, I already explained my reasons and justifications for the tag. I still hope that BitLucy will return their clients money, and that Royse777's reputation will recover.