Leo is pointing out obvious issues (like everyone else here) and I don't even know if he's a developer.
Damn it Jim! I'm a doctor, not a developer!would you recommend wasabi to someone who are not really up to censor anyone or someone who wil eventually want to send his coin to an exchange?
I wouldn't recommend Wasabi to anyone. There is no good reason to use it.I believe the idea is that if you use Wasabi, and they have the same 'source for taint definitions' as the centralized exchanges; then whatever was accepted by zkSnacks, will also be accepted by the exchange.
Maybe. Maybe not. Some exchanges accept gambled coins, some don't. Some exchanges accept mixed coins, some don't. Some exchanges accept coinjoined coins, some don't. It's a complete toss of the coin. Using Wasabi first does not guarantee your coins will be accept by any given centralized exchange by any means.Wooow that's some next-level shit right there! They want us to trust a centralized coordinator that openly and voluntarily works with Chainalysis, just as much as we trust the most secure, open and decentralized project in the world?
As we discussed previously in regards to the single candle picture, all of Wasabi's core team seem to have delusions of grandeur about the status of their wallet. Also note the next thing he says here:
Quote
Any sort of, you know, malicious or unfair thing would, would be, you know, openly discussed
So openly discussed that we will deliberately not mention it even once on our website, and indeed put a bunch of info in to our FAQs to make it sound like we would never do such a thing. 