Value of X is how people are able benefit from X without selling the X to new investors.
This definition is wrong tho and wouldn’t be accepted anywhere. You can use it for yourself it’s fine, but in a debate it’s ridiculous. If you’re so sure about it, then go ahead and write an academic paper about it and see it being eaten alive by peer review.
You are correct, but this is so wrong audience. These people don´t want to hear it. This forum is the place where BTC white paper was released. Their Bible.
You’ll see more people here engage in critical thinking and constructive discussion(even with idiots) than in most places. And also the whitepaper wasn’t released here, but nice try.
Again im telling you, if you work as an analyst in a company, or in academia(in places that still do science), people won’t be as nice to y’all as here, if y’all produce bs like this.
Then you’re also mixing religion with a software whitepaper, which:
1. Is ridiculous.
2. Just shows you can’t compete with actual arguments.
3. Did you ever see someone claim it is their bible? I don’t think so, you’re just letting ur personal bias influence your judgment.
They want you to show how there is still a hope that they get their hard-earned FIAT back.
You mean everyone who held for longer than 4 years is in profit?
And notice how i never mentioned profit till now, because Bitcoin isn’t about this, even tho it’s a nice side effect of sound money in an artificial fiat world.
i will disagree with you because can not say thing like that and if you want to convince us that bitcoin is better than fiat currency you can put them mostly the differences in a tabular form some that people will know why you said bitcoin is better than fiat currency, what i need is point and i can agree with you, but for now fiat is on it own and bitcoin is for it own the comparison will much and the similarity will be same
Everything i showed there is it’s own thing and coexists with each other. I even included Greshams law which takes this into account, if you’re too lazy to study then i cant help you. Also i compared the individual properties of gold, fiat and bitcoin with each other, a table won’t change what i wrote, but if you’re too lazy to read i cant help you. I didn’t say anything without an explanation behind it.
If you think anything in the comparison is wrong then point out what and we can discuss it. Otherwise it seems like you just don’t want to accept it, because it doesn’t fiat your personal bias.
But for me it's simply an intellectual challenge to engage in refuting of their myths and legends.
I didn’t hear you say something intellectual yet and if you tried to refute something you failed hard.