Don’t you think exchangers that do not follow AML should be excluded from your site? Or at least marked as untrustworthy.
Today netex24 exchanger sent me tainted btc. And obviously service which i wanted to top up blocked my account.
I checked transaction via AML bot:
Risk Score: 50% Medium risk transaction
Medium risk
Exchange ML Risk Veryhigh - 100%
Today netex24 exchanger sent me tainted btc. And obviously service which i wanted to top up blocked my account.
I checked transaction via AML bot:
Risk Score: 50% Medium risk transaction
Medium risk
Exchange ML Risk Veryhigh - 100%
In line with this, I am interested to know if the BestChange company subscribes to the idea that there are clean and dirty Bitcoins. I mean, yes, there are probably a lot of crimes in which Bitcoins are involved as there are countless others which involve fiat, but do you think that Bitcoins involved in these crimes are tainted and are therefore dirty and shouldn't be accepted by different Bitcoin platforms?
This is not so much our moral position, but the forced adherence to generally accepted norms. Regardless of our or anyone else's opinion, AML purity for cryptocurrency transactions has become as important a property as it is for fiat currencies. Most crypto transactions end up in centralized custodial services that adhere to standard rules for the entire global market, in particular, the fifth AML directive of the European Union (5AMLD). Therefore, in a sense, the widespread introduction of AML made BTC an analogue of NFT of the ERC-1155 standard
Witty. The “NF” in “NFT” stands for Non-Fungible, so you clearly are not so thoughtless about this as some people.
Regardless, everyone needs to be informed that the absurd notion of so-called “taint” is an existential threat to Bitcoin.
It literally means that 1 BTC ≠ 1 BTC.
Best_Change, I am not inclined to open a debate about this in your thread. I’m not here to start an argument with you. I hereby express no opinion either way about your service in itself, which I have not evaluated.
I speak out because the “coin taint” delusion is a cancer which continues to grow, as long as people give no pushback. People need to boycott services that peddle the “coin taint” lie; such services are untrustworthy and destructive to Bitcoin. People need to speak out, as I am doing here. “Coin taint” is only taking hold because its perpetrators are skilled propagandists, who make an obscene pretense of having some sort of moral high ground. The “tainting” of coins is wrong—it is outrageous—someone needs to call out the Emperor‘s New Clothes here.