Up until now I didn't want to give my opinion, but now I opposed this allegations against him.
I really don't understand some people who are acting like judge and executioner in this case, and continue to blame Royse for everything...
in real life they would probably cause someone to commit suicide or do something crazy
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632
Gotta agree with this. He for sure should have handled this situation much better, but was his intention to cheat anyone out of their money, or help someone doing that? I don't think so. So yeah, opposing the flag as well.I really don't understand some people who are acting like judge and executioner in this case, and continue to blame Royse for everything...
in real life they would probably cause someone to commit suicide or do something crazy
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632
He didn't cheat anyone imo, he's pretty much a victim himself, I'd agree he was naive and probably waited too long to pull the plug, however, I still believe if he had just come out as the campaign manager without saying that he was close to the owner/co-owner most of the victim would have joined any ways, none of the victim I've seen so far are close to Royse in the forum, so I'm not so sure how his statement were the main deciding factor for their action to bet on the site. Royse is not just as guilty as any manger that have promoted an ICO that turned out to be a scam, but also very every bounty participant that joined and influenced via the social media accounts, articles and/or video reviews.
The flag says:
Quote
that anyone dealing with Royse777 is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so.
By my interpretation of the above statement, that's not true. I'll be opposing the flag.
he can be trusted, but he lacks management skills; I will not hire or recommend him.
Come on man! He didn't come short or failed at his role as a campaign manager or marketer, if there were many users as victims shouldn't that means he did a good job or his influential, ironically ? ..
What happened is not good for his reputation and, he should have known better given how long he's been in this sphere and how many scam casinos/bookies have come and gone on this forum so I wouldn't blame UniJoin for calling it quits with him, yes because most people will be cautious of using any service he's representing or introducing to the forum henceforth.