The question that remains for me now is the support for the flag.
Most of us have given Royse777 the benefit of the doubt and changed the feedback from negative to neutral.
Also, many of us are still supporting the flag, and I think that is correct as there has been some sloppiness in Royse777's performance and it should be reflected in some way for a while as yahoo62278 said.
The only thing that seems a bit paradoxical, delete the negative feedback and continue supporting the flag.
I give Royse777 the benefit of doubt as far as I do not feel they set out to scam anyone. That fact alone changed my negative to a neutral. If I feel there was intent, my negative stays forever.
I still support the flag because I feel money is owed.
Those who are confused about my involvement with BitLucy. I have partnered with them and holding a small percent of share of the company. We are working on legal side to come to a contract and my role with them is Co-Partner & Marketing Director. I and the CEO are good friend and it's been over a year we are hanging out regularly. So we have been able to build up a level of trust to each others. We both wanted a business. Since we both understand the gambling industry we decided to bring the best in this space.
This statement from Royse777 themselves makes me feel that Royse777 is liable for any money owed, the same as the CEO. If Royse777 was strictly acting as a campaign manager and stopped promoting when he thought the company was a scam, then all is forgiven and life goes on. That's clearly not the case, Royse took ownership of any and all debts when agreeing to be a partner no matter how big or small a partner.
If all debts are settled or agreements are reached I have no problem removing support for the flag. I really cannot disagree with any who still have a negative on Royse at this point, but since I feel there wasn't intent to scam on the part of Royse777 I will keep my tag neutral.
As far as Royse still managing, I'm not against the user earning money because once again, they didn't have the intent to scam. It's up to potential clients as to whether or not they wanna hire Royse777. I do feel that maybe escrow might be an option for payments while money is owed, but that's not my call.