According to your
post from 2013, you told someone that you would repay someone with a balance of less than 1
BTC "after larger amounts [have been repaid]".
That was right after the hack. The handling around them wasn't great, particularly as CL issued loans to people and had to wait until they were repaid. Most of them were never repaid after the collapse.
In any litigation, any statements you make can potentially be used against you. So pirate40 for example decided to stop posting on the forum so that anything he wrote could not be used against him in court. pirate40 ended up going to prison anyway, although, by the time his enterprise collapsed, there were no lingering questions if he was running a scam. Other scammers simply stopped using their accounts after their account was no longer able to produce income for them -- some of these scammers may still be here, operating under different names.
After Inputs.io collapsed, many months elapsed, and TradeFortress made statements on the forum that IMO reduced the likelihood of being pursued in court for deposits he did not honor. For example, TradeFortress tried to join a signature campaign, despite allegedly having millions of dollars worth of stolen coin (value at the time). I might point out that obtaining a judgment against someone with no assets will only get you a bill from your attorney.
I'm still here because I didn't do anything wrong. I wouldn't have tried joining a signature campaign if I was sitting on millions of dollars of bitcoins, lol.
IIRC, after bitfinex was hacked in 2016, you had moved ~1,000
BTC in order to impress some girl you knew IRL. I believe the value of 1000
BTC was worth approximately $600k at the time.[/quote]
Repayments happened throughout 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.
As suchmoon said, I believe you had trolled your customers with some song.
Mental health issues.
let me just say that while it cannot be proved who ran with the coins from the "hack,"
As I mentioned in my previous post, I think the question of if the "hack" was real or fake is a moot point. Especially so for the inputs.io case. If people were depositing money to tradefortress' business (inputs.io) with the expectation that the money would be returned on demand, I don't think the fact that
x happened is any excuse to not honor that expectation.
It's not a moot point. If there was no hack, Inputs.io would probably be running today. The hack was the reason that caused Liabilities > Assets; whereas this was never the case prior to the hack.