But what’s the point in this project if we already have several such projects lying around. What’s the difference between yours and the one that already exists. Starting from the bitcoin itself we have encountered whole new arena of co-ownership of the decentralised world bank. Every individual holding small to heavy balances in terms of bitcoin is already owning their bank and free from the centralised bank’s regulations. So apart from this any new project that comes up would be added advantage for us.
That's it! Added advantage. Maybe that's the one that we can get from his project but for us that are already contented on what older projects has to offer and we are too conscious about our security then we can just stick on them and there is no need for us to try newly created projects no matter offers they have as we didn't know that what if those new projects are not decentralized as the bitcoin and other old projects?
The idea of having a decentralized world bank still won't make sense but it seems that I am right because if we read the title of the thread again, it says "co-owner", so it means they are still the one that controls most of our funds. Geez I don't like that, sorry.