If I properly understand what you are saying, that is not a bad point - not that we need to compete with each other in terms of "which one of us gets richer" because from my point of view, I think that one of the major points continues to be the extent to which anyone of us is able to apply his/her BTC strategies in such a way that complements his/her own individual circumstances, which might not necessarily result in higher performance down the road in regards to one indicator (how much richie did I get, for example) but instead just providing a certain level of comfort regarding risk management and being able to sleep better at night, even if the end result may well not be doing whatever it takes to get more richie. 

Surely, we see that some times, guys engage in gambling techniques because their goals are to end the day being more richie than their neighbor or some random person on the interwebs (or being able to say "I told you so"), and those do seem like shallow goals even though we likely do need to admit that a lot of us (not even excluding yours truly here) may well have tendencies to engage in these kinds of potentially shallow competitive comparisons.

It is not necessarily even bad to make comparisons, and I have found it to sometimes be beneficial to suggest that someone's investing into BTC technique seems to NOT even be beating a reasonable/prudent DCA strategy, so maybe it is not fair of me to do that, but many of us have come to realize that DCA can be carried out in a way that allows it to serve as a decently low stress technique to ongoingly invest into BTC without so much getting caught up in the day to day or getting caught up in the fairly violent price swings that can take years (even up to 4 years or longer (we have seen in recent times) to play themselves out).   

So, perhaps it is somewhat cruel of me and maybe even somewhat insensitive to criticize folks for underperforming a reasonable/prudent long term DCA strategy, and I find it somewhat irrelevant if they have outperformed a reasonable/prudent long term DCA strategy - even if that could be icing on the cake and or attributable to either skill, luck or both, and it can be very difficult to really have any kinds of knowledge regarding whether their ability to outperform a reasonable/prudent long term DCA strategy is replicable.

From my point of view, sometimes there can be some fruitfulness in making comparisons - so long as we are attempting to minimize the injection of ego into the competition, and surely its not easy to keep our egos in check - especially if we happen to be a human (not naming any names here - nor trying to subtly insert my lil selfie into such club)