⭐ Merited by paxmao (1)
Interracial marriage is protected by the 14th and 15th amendments.
The 15th Amendment says nothing about marriage, and the 14th Amendment protects it in the exact same way it protected abortion. If you argument is that Roe should be thrown out on these grounds, then you are also arguing that Loving should be thrown out on the exact same grounds. Anything else is hypocrisy.Further, courts, including the Supreme Court, only rule on actual controversies, and I am unaware of any serious attempts to make either contraception, nor interracial marriage illegal.
Yet. But Thomas was already explicitly clear in his statement that he has his eyes on Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell next.I am not aware of any arguments saying that Roe was correctly decided, the arguments that I have heard have been that the ability of states to regulate abortions is a bad thing.
So every ruling by multiple different Supreme Courts made up of many different justices which confirmed Roe or based other rulings on Roe were all wrong? But now that this religiously driven and non-impartial court have decided to overturn it, they are ones who got it right? Confirmation bias much?The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot discriminate against religious schools when funding schools.
Let's have the Satanic Temple open a school there and see just how quickly they get discriminated against. 