Re: User: Unknown01 threatens me with a forum ban for saying my opinion
@1miau this is the first time I've writing to you since a long time: you are so sure that you are right, so here is my offer to you: I will put down my signature if more than 50% of the German established community (at least 10 merits in the last 3 months from 5 different people and at least senior member rank) support your view that your trust entry was justified and I'm a shitposter, but if more than 50% don't agree, then you put your signature down! Deal?
It seems to be a very fair deal and like in a democracy the majority decides, you're for democracy right?
It seems to be a very fair deal and like in a democracy the majority decides, you're for democracy right?
I would go along with that deal, sounds fair to me. I'll put down my signature as well. If the community feels that this will promote quality and make it better, then we can do this. Let's go 1miau, it's your turn.
My opinion for colleagues here:
All the people present here are my witnesses that I offered a fair deal and wanted to let the German community decide. All up from senior member rank with minimum 10 earned merits from 5 different people in the last 3 months (actually I meant the last 120 days) would have been entitled to vote, but 1miau decides independently who is a Shitposter on the German board and who is not, and it mainly depends on who represents his opinion and who represents an opposing opinion. He knows that he doesn't have a chance and therefore doesn't get involved in a democratic vote and counters again with his standard statement: All Shitposter. So let's make it clear: All members on the German board are for 1miau from the rank of senior (or higher) with <50 merits are shitposters. Does the English community really see it that way? My proposed solution was simple and, in my opinion, fair and difficult to manipulate.
Just maybe you know that 10 (earned) Merit are basically nothing. All the people present here are my witnesses that I offered a fair deal and wanted to let the German community decide. All up from senior member rank with minimum 10 earned merits from 5 different people in the last 3 months (actually I meant the last 120 days) would have been entitled to vote, but 1miau decides independently who is a Shitposter on the German board and who is not, and it mainly depends on who represents his opinion and who represents an opposing opinion. He knows that he doesn't have a chance and therefore doesn't get involved in a democratic vote and counters again with his standard statement: All Shitposter. So let's make it clear: All members on the German board are for 1miau from the rank of senior (or higher) with <50 merits are shitposters. Does the English community really see it that way? My proposed solution was simple and, in my opinion, fair and difficult to manipulate.
I've not said that every account under 50 earned Merit is a shitposter, it's highly dependant on activity and registration date.
But for your bet it just sounds extremely shady. We can set it up with neutral conditions, with a neutral trusted user from DT1, not where you are manipulating the rules in your favour.
e.g. if I told you now go and lick XY's ass or you're a pig or not a human, interesting that that's okay.
The way you're talking usually tells a lot about yourself. First post of yours in this topic you were lying, now this. This is the picture you're offering.
Interesting that 5 years and 3700 posts on this forums and you didn't care about its rules.
This!