Unfortunately unlucky, it's all lose guys 
yeah I'll tell it, at first I played at the Booongo provider in several games Hodl On Win etc I played manually and calmed down with a few beats, when it reached $50 then I switched to Pragmatic Olympus bet $1 all manual profit 300 and then you're right @Strongkored I switched to Sweet Bonanza so 400. Did not reach the maximum wager, at the wrong time unfortunately it lost but it's fun.
Well you are just trying to be given the sensation of playing and are not allowed to withdraw the bonus because it has not reached 100% wagering. At $400 it's only 15% and you really will have to lose a lot to achieve a 100% drawdown. Too bad maybe among other users, only you have achieved the highest victory. yeah I'll tell it, at first I played at the Booongo provider in several games Hodl On Win etc I played manually and calmed down with a few beats, when it reached $50 then I switched to Pragmatic Olympus bet $1 all manual profit 300 and then you're right @Strongkored I switched to Sweet Bonanza so 400. Did not reach the maximum wager, at the wrong time unfortunately it lost but it's fun.High withdrawal requirements are made so you can play long and lose concentration. Lol
But that's just how it is to keep everyone curious.
This is why i never do expect on hitting that thresold whenever im tending to chase on hitting the withdrawal button.Dont expect much but its not bad to anticipate
and at the same time you do really able to enjoy and entertain yourself.
@ Blizz.io, welcome to the forum! Site design and overall offering wasnt really bad at all.
the wagering requirement is high in my opinion. but what Doell achieved was not everyday scenario that someone can turn 8 bucks to 400 bucks. the blizz team should reconsider lowering their wagering requirements, at least an achievable one so players will be encouraged to play using their bonus. it is understandable to have high wagering requirements but if it is too high, then, it is just another way of saying you can't get out alive here...
Making out this changes seems really that too interesting yet you cant always see that house do really made out some adjustment because the lower the requirement the higher risk that they'll lose some
part of revenue but well amounts cant really be just too big yet limitations would really be imposed or applied.You could really make out some comparison in between those requirements and would
tell for yourself if its really worth to stay or would find another one.Competition is tough which its understandable on making out some little bit adjustments to cater out on what
the community needs.