If everything turns out to be proven then that would really be the ending of any casinos or businesses out there but it turns out that some accusations are just simply trolling or trying out to ruin other sites reputation but the community arent that dumb to believe into something which hadnt been proved out which it would be mostly be ignored thats why anyone who do make out some accusations couldnt really get that sympathy unless if its been proven out but if not then expect that you would be ignored.
Accusations must be valid to make sense. Flag must be supported enough by DT members to make sense. If accusations or flags are invalid, they are not make sense and can not affect reputation of a casino.
I implied about bad impression on new users of a casino, new members in the forum. They are not experienced enough, they don't understand how trust, trust feedback, flag, scam accusation on the forum are assessed as valid or invalid. It is like when you a not a crypto investor but hear someone say "Crypto is scam", you will absorb it as a barrier to enter into crypto market.
Site/platforms does have terms and conditions which it is really just common sense that once you do violate then you would really experience those headaches.
Good platforms do care about their users. In TrustDice, we have it.
