We don’t have a notion of a “negative review” on our website, the red marks unsolved financial claims to the service.
Why not? I've never used your service, but is it an advertising service for exchanges, or is it a service to help customers find an exchange for their needs? If it's the latter then you should certainly have reviews, if it's the former then you're just shilling for the AML/KYC scammers like Freewallet and your service is absolutely useless.
The icon is obligatory only if KYC is obligatory for every (or for the absolute majority) of transactions. It there are random KYC-check for transactions with high level of AML-risk, we don’t make exchangers set this icon. However, we always urge users to get acquainted with the exchange rules before the operation, after coming to the exchanger’s website.
I won't say this is intentionally misleading, but it's definitely misleading nonetheless.
Please understand that AML does not threaten the integrity of bitcoin ecosystem as such, but it only limits the work with gateways between the traditional financial system and the crypto world.
I'm calling BS on this. Bitcoin was intended to put individuals in control of their wealth, and take control away from governments and instructions who've bastardized the financial industry to keep masses beholden to their services, and therefor fees and control. The fact that we have the commonly used term "Financial Industry" in our vocabulary is a testament to their bastardisation of money. What "industry?" What do they actually produce? What value do they add to the lives of normal citizens?
Allowing governments and their "financial institution" cohorts to apply their restrictions on bitcoin only allows them to continue their policy of using finances to enslave the populous.