Couldn't agree more.
But following your example... if "we" are 51% of investors asking the same shit over and over, does it make any difference?
Or even more simple. Asking what happened to the previous (end of Feb) "promises"?
Seeing him logging into the forum and not answering (or not updating us) is like seeing a debitor who owns you something and he doesn't even acknowledge you. Doesn't really give you a good feeling, doesn't it?
I'm sure Cryptx logs in to check what the current sentiment is among people posting in this thread. Which means, in all likelihood, Cryptx hears your concerns.
If you look back to the start of the year, this project missed it's initial deployment window too. The mine was supposed to be up and running at the start of January and the first dividend wasn't paid out until the end of February.
I'm not saying it's acceptable, but I have come to expect delay as par for the course in this realm.
IMO, the biggest mistake Cryptx made was promising the 700 TH/s before the project met its initial goals. That attracted a lot of investors who bought in without realizing the history of this project. As a shareholder from when Peta was still on cryptostocks, mum has always been the word and there have been periods of "inactivity" while waiting for deliveries before. I think Cryptx is acting just as they always have.