He enjoyed using the money disregarding what will be the consequences of it. That guy should learn his lesson.
Indeed. Its a huge amount accidentally sent to his bank account, he's aware its not his money but still use it to gamble as if its his own. Instead of coordinating to the bank he gambled it away.
Now, even he return the money, it doesnt mean he's a good guy. Its his responsibility and he should face the consequence of his action.
I don't know whether to call that act irresponsible, because by playing such a huge amount of money it means that he was very aware of it, he may have shown and killed his ances for the game, but now he has to face other consequences, this wants to say that his act of irresponsibility was a gesture of immaturity, but that he will finally be able to pay and that makes him a person who is responsible for his actions, it could hardly be judged, because he is covering up the bad with an act of total responsibility, because very well You can claim that you do not have the money or the ability to pay, and you can claim that the money was in your account.
That is also possible, right? But I don't think he forgot the risks entailed with it and now he should be jailed for the money that was spent in gambling activities. He should just ask the bank directly about the money that was mistakenly sent to his account rather than just throwing his life because of what the did. It's also unfortunate for that bank teller who made the mistake and I believe he/she was already jobless now.
I'm sure he knows that risk and due to his gambling problem he take that risk and gamble all the money till he losses everything,
In terms of the teller, Not sure if he/she should be sanctions since he just processing the transfer and it's the senders mistake
both sides are the liable with this and not the bank, my personal take though. Bank serves as medium for transaction and
tellers are just processing the request between sender and receiver.
So who should be blamed in the bank's side? I'm pretty sure that they are looking in their side who would take the blame so that the bank won't be heavily blamed and it will result in a human error. About the man who gambled the funds, I'm sure he's now getting dumped in the prison and who knows that man is already living in hell because the government is putting pressure on the warden (some instances these will happen).
I wonder the same, who could judge something like that? I don't know what the laws in Japan will be like, but I imagine that they must be very rigid, but this case is very ambiguous, for my personal opinion I would say that no one is to blame, of course, there is some irresponsibility to play with so much money and bet it, I would have I did something else, maybe play but with more control and it would have multiplied, but not everything turns out the way you want.